NOTICE that the arguments of the flunkies of the Establishment Overdogs who'll be reading at Miller Hall April 17th don't attempt to put forth the rightness of their positions, the talent of their words and voices, or the justice of their cause. Like aristocrats of days past they argue from their own weakness. "Leave us alone!" they plead. "We're fragile personalities of delicate health!"
To which I respond: Abdicate.
I'm sure they have nice health plans, these tenured profs, while for myself as for so many Americans (for so many ULAers), if I get sick, I die. Shinder, Lopate, Doty, and Moody have it many times easier than most of us. If they can't survive their lives, how would they survive ours?
If they're really so weak, they should abdicate.
Because we've targeted the Poster Boy of Corruption in our arguments, we're said to have "personal" grudges, when our fight is about the System of Literature and those it puts in charge.
Abdicate!
Poster Boy travels with a phalanx of security. Columbia, supposed icon of anti-censorship, is flooded with guards to protect the professors and children of affluence. They tell us their guards are even more broke and hungry than we are! Who pays them? Who runs this society? Aren't the leaders graduates of Ivy League temples of privilege like Columbia? Didn't they create this world? Isn't Poster Boy's money-center banker father one of the rulers of the globe? Let's add to our protest a protest at the impoverished conditions of the aristocrats' guards!
Abdicate!
We're told Doty and Lopate don't even like Ginsberg's writing. They'll be on stage regardless. Their towers of privilege are scams, their poetry is a fraud. They don't deserve their lofty station and know it. Their only surprise at our outcry is that it took so long. Their art is decrepit, roadblock to renewal, unable to connect with the populace. Their poetry academy with $150 admission fee protects not the nation's best poetry but its worst. We're here to denounce their bastions and barriers of inequity and falsehood.
ABDICATE!
skip to main |
skip to sidebar
Buy American Pop Lit at Barnes & Noble
Buy American Pop Lit at Amazon
Tweets
Fun Stuff
- A Tale of Two Literary Worlds
- Literary Nomenklatura
- The Literary Story Examined
- American Literary Apparatchiks
- The Believer ULA Essay Part I
- The Believer ULA Essay Part II
- The Believer ULA Essay Part III
- The Believer ULA Essay Part IV
- End of the Pods
- The Timid Generation
- Three Question Archive
- Jonathan Lethem and Postmodernism
- What Kind of Revolution Is It?
Blog Archive
-
▼
2006
(217)
-
▼
March
(13)
- ULA Invasion?
- The Stakes: Defining American Literature
- Abdicate!
- CHALLENGE!!!!
- Democracy or Exclusiveness?
- Worried E-Mails
- How the Columbia "Howl" Event Celebrates Censorship
- American Literature Today: Aristocrats or the Street?
- More n+1: Readings
- Beat Down
- Games of the Literary Establishment
- Not Politics-- Reality
- "Know-Nothings": A Poem
-
▼
March
(13)
Links
- New Pop Lit
- Fast Pop Lit
- NPL News
- New Pop Lit's Open Mic
- New Pop Lit Extra
- American Pop Lit
- Happy America Lit
- The Literary Circus
- Crime City Blog
- Detroit Literary
- Election Follies 2012
- Literary Mystery
- Blitz Book Review
- El Cid Project
- Philly Zeen
- Populist America
- Philly Literary
- Happy Writing
- Petition to PEN
- ULA
- ULA Poetry and Fiction
- ULA Review
- ULA Press
- Wred
- How Publishing Is Rigged
- Dust Bowl Poetry
- Books Inq
- New Yorker Commas
- Random Rae
- American Dissident
- Blue Collar Holler
- Idiom Poets
- Piggy Plutocrats
- A Practical Policy
- Remnants
- Litkicks
- Complete Review
- Emerging Writers
- Germ Books
- Fran
- Salome
- Syntax
- First Line
- You Are Here
- Josh Saitz
- Sunday Salon
About Me
- King Wenclas
- The ultimate literary outlaw. "I could be bounded in a nutshell and call myself a king of infinite space." -William Shakespeare
35 comments:
First, we ARE the little guy.
Second, your posts are tending to contradict themselves. Earlier, on my previous post, you mock us for having no influence. Now you attack us for making the noise necessary to have an impact in this noisy world.
Our task is not just to expose corruption in the literary world-- as we've done, and which people like you close your eyes to.
It's also to get attention to underground writers-- to the cause of underground writers.
We make noise anyway we can! The alternative is to be shut out-- permanently shut out-- in this allegedly "democratic" society which isn't democratic at all.
But what's your stake in this? Obviously you have one, or you wouldn't be so worked up.
Take off the mask and let us know who you are.I've been very patient in letting you have your say. Is that it? Anything else?
Re: the Miller Hall reading. I don't know anything about them getting paid-- but they are paid by the literary system now in place to represent American literature today; supposedly the "best of the best." Even you admit they're doing a poor job of it.
I came into this debate fifteen years ago as an outsider, when I scanned through lit journals and said, "Is this it? Is that all there is?"
The fact is that these characters are frauds-- which is why they would never debate us or read against us. (The Paris Review did in 2001-- amd have hid the video of the event ever since, because their attempts at argument were ripped to shreds.)
The association with Howl by them is made BY THEM. They're drawing the connection. It's laughable, which is what we're pointing out.
(p.s. It's funny how demi-puppets deny that there are even such things as hierarchies in this stratified society. There are, in literature as elsewhere. It's easily documented that a relatively small class of poets and writers get the vast bulk of available resources, and more important, institutional support, as exhibited with this event. Institutions lead to the stagnation of art. We oppose this.)
Re "conspiracy." Who has used that word except you?
Would you call the election of George W Bush a conspiracy? I don't. It's simply the way things are. A sliver of the society gets 90% of the power.
Is it a conspiracy that 9 of the last 10 major party presidential candidates were grads of Harvard or Yale, or both? Hmm. What does that look like to you? Any thoughts?
It can be defined by a better word than conspiracy-- I use aristocracy.
Do you really believe this same situation does not exist in the worlds of literature and major media?
Aren't the overwhelming majority of editors on major mag mastheads-- existing organs of publicity for writers-- Ivy League grads? Maybe all of them in some cases-- when one excludes the presence on the staffs of upper-class Brits.
The 3rd issue of n+1-- a "legitimate" lit journal, hardly a proponent of the ULA-- contained an article documneting the token, almost miniscule presence of the bottom two-thirds of society at this nation's most prestigious universities. Are they conspiracy theorists also?
Columbia, in the real world, isn't just any school. It's a power center whose grads go on to hold power positions in politics, media, and literature. It's one of the major centers of intellectual debate in this country-- approved debate that is. When we focus our arguments upon it, we're focusing at the very heart of the beast.
Who can deny this?
Regarding our anonymous poster:
I've re-examined your argument. it seems to consist of this:
Yes, the posers at Miller Hall aren't very relevant or good. You take issue with our taking issue with THEM.
You're apathetic about them-- totally apathetic-- but not about us.
Does this make sense?
Every corrupt system or bureaucracy, from the French aristocrats to the Soviet Union, survived because the bulk of the population are sheep. Don't make noise! (As soon as someone did, the corrupt systems collapsed.)
Should we be apathetic about literature? Should we be apathetic about the world we live in-- or blindly accept it, as would an ant, or an amoeba?
I'm not. Reading became very important to me at an early age. It rescued me from the muck and violence of the city I then lived in. I hate to see it continually trashed by fakes. I've sought to speak about this.
You want documentation of our case?
I provided it in 45 issues of New Philistine through the 1990's. Gee, do you think a conglom will publish them in a book? I think rather not!
(Even though my paying subscribers included many of the most lauded young writers of the day.)
One of the issues was publicly destroyed by a colleague of Jason Shinder's at Bennington College, of all places. (I wasn't there, but received three notes from well-known writers who were there about the incident.) The issue discussed the incestuous relationship which existed between AWP and the NEA at the time-- embarrassing stuff.
Now groups like Foetry are carrying the anti-corruption ball. Are they conspiracy theorists also?
You sound like an O.J. fan, who would still believe his innocence even if caught on video-cam!
I'll make here a point I made on Foetry-- that the ULA is not just about debate. We're also about action-- the action required to build an alternative literature, which is what we're doing. Now excuse me, I have work to do.
-Karl "King" Wenclas, ULA, Philadelphia Chapter.
Oops: one last comment.
Where's the hate in our Challenge?
We'd love to meet these guys as brothers in literature, and read against them, and have a beer afterward.
The hate is on their side-- a refusal to throw over their exclusive club; to acknowledge the existence of writers who live outside their world and who don't play by their rules.
"True That," you say "I guess I just hate liars." Then why do you hide your identity under fake handles? You sound kinda familiar...
Against your point, "the Columbia reading has nothing to do with literature," i say WHY NOT? Shouldn't the self-proclaimed 50th anniversary of HOWL celebration have something to do with literature?? Was Ginsberg's HOWL written and presented to further his career, or did it have social and literary significance?
T: "If your work is good, people will positively flock to it, because readers desperately want to read the good shit and there's not much of it around. That's how the beats did it, by writing and hustling and supporting one another. Not by begging for the largesse of Big Brother and broadcasting their shock!"
T, you're naive.
If work is good AND READERS FIND OUT ABOUT IT they'll read it.
How do readers find out about good work from writers outside of the machine? Hello? Any examples? Can you get there from here?
I think you could add PROTEST to your list of things the Beats did or would do. Making NOISE.
We make noise about our work and we make noise to challenge the lameness of what the machine gets up to.
We're not begging largesse. We show what's going on and obviously everyone is then free to do what they do.
Let a millionaire take an NEA grant now.
Our noise has made people consider alternatives they hadn't before. Our rabblerousing has gotten attention for our underdog writers and has provoked unrivaled questioning of the behavior of the literary machine.
We haven't gotten all that far yet, but we have done some cool things. And we've done it on pennies. We go for it as best we can. We've already called the literati on things that they'd been getting away with for years, and we've gotten response.
We do have writing already available that's better than theirs. We'll work to make it more available and get more attention for it.
T, your "you-guys-are-just-like-them" thing is so old. Like them in that we take NEA grants even though we're millionaires? Like them in that we give big cash prizes to our pals while not bothering even reading the rest of the entries? Like them in our $1000 table dinners? Like them in that we write about our hard times when we really haven't had them? Like them in that we use fake names? Like them in that we exclude our personal lives from our work because our jerkiness doesn't matter compared to the perfectness of our style? Like them in that irony is everything in our work? Give it a rest, T. You've been going on about this for almost a year now.
This anonymous thing is darn funny. Remember the first one of them who got unmasked on Amazon? Man, THAT was funny! I bet that still stings. No one wants to be the first to screw up while hassling a bunch of nobodies like us. Ouch. Can you imagine? The INDIGNITY of it all---getting caught out being all paranoid and stalkery like that. The rest don't matter. The first sets the tone. (Ouch.)
Once more for good measure...
T: "That's how the beats did it, by writing and hustling and supporting one another. Not by begging for the largesse of Big Brother and broadcasting their shock!"
...Control issues is it, T?
I don't think the Beats need you to tell them how they'd do things. Why do you try to put words in their mouths? Actually, your litany sounds about right in a vague, naive way. I could see them broadcasting all kinds of shock. Anyway, that's what we're doing, too: we're writing, hustling and supporting each other. Just not the way you'd like. But I notice you haven't had any better suggestions, other than "hold your own readings" and the people will magnetically flow to our writing if it's good. But, no, we're just not letting anyone be the boss of us, especially someone who just wants to be in control, without adding anything. No initiative, no nerve of their own. Anything wild and willynilly just makes 'im scream and run, doesn't it. Precious. T, you seem a little clingy. Just let it go.
T, you have quite the interest in psychoanalysis and inner judgement and verdict-making. Scary to think of how you put it to use.
But, hey, we have a bone to pick with the boss-lads in the building, so why not just let us see if we can stir something up? We're pushing for debate, for reaction---to provoke them into further outreach, into doing something/anything new. Let them surprise us (or anyone) for a change. Nothing will happen if no one pushes.
Do you have some stake in this or something? Doubtful. You seem to be just casting about. Why don't you go try to go make a little impact of your own somewhere and report back to us how you do. --It can even be from down at the bar or with your girlfriend. We're here to listen.
Oh, dear, about that 'True that' fellow.
"Self deluded." "Attacks." "Victimized." "Persecution complex." "Scummy lies." "Self-important grandstanding." "Lobotomized minions." "Fearless truthtellers." "Left wing pseudo-revolutionaries." "Egotistical."Obsessed." "Petty jealousy and rage don't become cute or noble..."
All the faux colloquialisms in the world can't mask THAT sophomoric and pseudo-diagnostic voice. Yes, indeed, Patrick, that voice sounds very familiar. All that's missing is "bully" and "narcissist."
Purely my own opinion, of course. But I think I know EXACTLY who this pain in the butt is.
Let me say it again: I'm not ULA material, but I say GIVE 'EM HELL!
And dearest T., let me suggest you take some of your own advice: "These people aren't doing anything to you. Your vitriol is totally baffling, and the fact that you seem to think it justifies your hateful attacks is insane."
You're still TRANSPARENT, demi-puppet!
T., to once again explain it in case anyone else is out there wondering:
*We work together to amplify our voices. Where we disagree we tend to keep it to ourselves and do our own things. Where we can help each other, we do. In this way, readers, writers, and publishers who previously had no voice (no matter their merit) who have no cash, credential (beyond the street) or backing, can finally be heard. We're outward looking and working. The modern impulse to fixate interiorly obviously sends people like you, T., into truly useless tizzies.
*We challenge our enemies to get reactions, sure, but why would someone be so stuck in an interior rut as to think that's our endpoint? (Kids today get so narrow.) We use reactions to shed light on the underground. Our noise provokes the public to wake up to whole categories of literature that have been overlooked, such as folk-writing and zining. Editor Gottleib said there were no undiscovered geniuses in the hinterlands. We keep putting the spotlight back on that. I think Ginsberg (his early cohorts for sure) would've seen the difference.
*What's this obsession on smarts and gender? Has cleverness and PC helped your paralysis any, T.? That's kidsplay. There's a lot more to life, and to quality. This paralyzed obsession is common among MFAers. Not among active, thriving zinesters who know that all our faculties are needed, not just brains alone (ask Henry Miller) and certainly not brains frozen inwardly in a grimace of analysis, cleverness, irony and bitterness. No one wants to read that. Goes nowhere. Does nothing. Except nag.
*The blindness of the interior approach is amazing. It's part of what's led Lit into today's deadend. T declares himself to be useless and hints that because we face huge odds that we're useless, too. He discounts the effects of DOING SOMETHING ABOUT IT. Of joining together. Of publicly standing up for what one believes in. Of holding events in all kinds of unlikely, even hostile, places. He conveniently misses all that. The thing is that we've already made a difference. Our method works. To get downtrodden talent some of the respect it deserves. We'll keep pressing on. Learning as we go. Not stuck wallowing in lame interior analysis.
"False" knows little about the ULA (if you knew me you'd know I have little interest in money or material possessions) ands equally little about history, beyond what he gets from media brainwashing.
Nice Hank Williams example-- but the truth is that most c&w ("Hillbilly music" at the time) as well as blues singers were scorned by the general culture. This is an entire essay in itself. It took the explosion of Elvis to truly break roots music into the mainstream. B.B. King was singing on streetcorners!
The Beats were very publicity conscious.
It's no wonder you hide your identity. Your arguments aren't very good-- they merely show your own resentment, at us, for making the noise, taking the stand, you wish you were capable of. But you're not.
You can't even tell us who you are!
Why do we dare posit ourselves as the true inheritors of the Beats?
Because we're the only non-sheep in the lit-world today.
Because we're doing it-- taking a stand against the fakes, which no one else will.
The Gallic warrior was asked by various chieftans by what right he put himself forward as the leader of rebellion against the imperialist Romans? He replied, the right that he was doing it!
Our energy and our enthusiasm for literature is our right, which the System-approved fakers don't have. They're tired priests going through the motions, practicing the rituals of a religion in which they no longer believe.
The Miller Hall affair will be a tired ritual. I've seen dozens of them. Enough! Time to put the enervated sideshow which established literature has become to sleep and start over.
We're literary insurgents-- yet we give more accountability than the mandarins, who are subject to no accountability at all. I've answered questions about the ULA in open forum after open forum. The criticisms have all been made, questions asked and answered. At least bring something new to the table, "False," or I'll shut the ghost that you are off. (And other ghosts like Charlie along with you.)
Then you can ask your questions of the mandarins. By how could you? Where is their blog?
(What's the difference between Hiram F. and George W.? See any? Both have their legions of supporters insisting how talented they are.
In fact they're both pure products of American money, which is corrupting this society. They're examples of total hierarchy, of the ever-widening gulf between rich and poor in this country (as we see a semi-permanent class of "guest worker" slaves about to be created, the tenuous economic existence of the working class and middle class destroyed as this occurs. This is reality.)
We may have to endure aristocrats in the political realm. We don't have to with our literature, and we won't.
The ULA is the new, democratic alternative. We welcome all who wish to rescue literature to join the fight. (Backbones required.)
Are you a writer, "False"? You don't seem to know very much about the world in which you live.
Who cares about mainstream culture?
Last time I checked it was inescapable. One can't turn on any segment of media without being bombarded with it. Hundreds of TV shows and radio stations, thousands of glossy periodicals, tens of thousands of slickly packaged books-- and all of it produced by a handful of conglomerates!
Bush and Moody are both hothouse plants raised the same way; put forward as the best in their respective fields. In both cases it's a lie. You can't disagree with this, because you know it's true.
The ULA democratic? We have our own forum for internal discussions. There are quite a few disagreements! More contention-- by far-- than what can be found in the established lit-world.
The fact is that I've backed off my ideas, have compromised them, for the sake of the ULA, time after time. It comes with being part of a cooperative endeavor-- something which you'd never understand.
That you think there's no difference between ourselves and the mandarins of literature reveals your own cluelessness. You must live in a bubble.
I have upcoming a post arguing that our society is more conformist that the world the Beats came from. The differences between social groups now is far, far greater. This is why Hirm F. believes himself to be middle-class. After all, there's Bill Gates, compared to whom the Poster boy of Literary Corruption is a pauper.
Getting a little farther down the ladder and the differences become more apparent.
The ULA is fighting for a voice in this noisy society. You oppose this-- which puts you on the other side of us. Can you seriously argue that you're not? Neutral? Sure you are!
Yet you ignore the gigantic fact of privilege on one side of you, while scorning a handful of street poets and shit disturbers.
My, that gleaming tower of NOISE known as American culture is extremely loud. How do we, who come from the heartland mass of this country, make ourselves heard?
Do we give up our democratic right to be heard?
Do we close up shop and go home, and become anonymous apathetic ghosts like yourself?
Not much of a choice, is it?
By gathering our voices together in a group, we exercising our right to exist and to be heard. It's as simple as that.
By protesting the Fakes, we are going to have a lot of fun.
We've united our voices, sure. The first task of any rebellion is to survive-- as reactionary forces attack and attack and attack again, which has been the way throughout history.
Change is irresistible.
You've aligned yourself against change, against the unstoppable force of history, Ghost.
You know this, which is why you hide your true self.
You don't want to be caught on the losing side!
Bark away. Until you can put an identity next to your words you mean nothing.
The Demi-Puppet's inescapable contradiction.
he's opposed to us for two possible reasons.
1.) He believes literature today is fine and in no need of change.
2.) He agrees with change, but dislikes our tactics.
But if one is for change, ours is the only possible tactic.
Incrementalism has been tried again and again. It doesn't work.
Does he posit an alternative strategy which will work?
Maybe HIS strategy-- attacking the agents of change and otherwise existing as an anonymous unknown blip? Very effective!
This is the box he's put himself in. In fact he's not for change at all. And the quiet ship of American Lit floats on silently and uselessly as before.
There's a zeenster prisoner in the Northwest named Cassidy Wheeler that the ULA's Bill Blackolive has been trying to help. This is a cause we'll be taking on after the Howl nonsense.
We can have an impact after we build a platform in this society-- a place on which to stand. We were halfway there a couple years ago. We're going after it again.
Re the Ghost.
The reason he is upset at us and not the aristocrats (somehow I don't picture him outside Miller Hall with a protest sign on his own) should be obvious.
It's tied into what the ULA is about.
We exist to bring contention and noise to the literary world!
That's a big part of our mission.
We're attempting (no mean feat) to wake literature up.
Can we do it?
I noticed on the archives of the old zine newsgroup the way posts spiked up dramatically whenever we stirred things up.
Contention works.
We're here to bring it to the somnolent literary world.
We may bring it again to New York City, the center of media empire.
we may bring it to the very steps of Miller Hall itself! (Need bus money first.)
The Ghost will have a lot more to be resentful and fearful about.
Anyone want to make some literary history?
Let's do it!
(The Ghost has so stirred me up I feel like taking action-- which the ULA hasn't done in years.
Thanks, Ghost!)
Stay tuned.
Hey Ghost-- if Poster Boy and his friends won't read against us at Miller Hall, then maybe we'll read against you! Are you up to it?
I seem to recall a tape of you reading which exists someplace. (Maybe Charlie has heard it.)
Excuse me for saying it, but you're not very good.
The quality of the recording, I guess. Same thing happened to John Gilbert.
Let's read outside at Columbia and find out for sure!
The best way to find the inheritors of the Beats is to READ out loud!
(A short story: back in 2004 I was attending poetry readings as an observer; content not to get up there; hardly the egomaniac I'm alleged to be at all. Then someone castigated me as "not a poet." I wrote some new poetry-- hadn't done so in years-- and attended a few open mics attended by the city's "best"-- mopped the floor with most of them. Some, like the Sufi poet, have never forgiven me for upstaging them.)
Start practicing, Ghost. Maybe you can improve.
truth that's discours has a lot
in common with a freeper disinformation agents propaganda
Frank, thanks for joining the noise and tossing in your tip and two bits. Good artists who can deal with the real world without giving up on folks---that's who we're after.
As for T.:
*We don't care that you hate us or anyone else. How could that matter? You're irrelevant.
*Cesspool? I don't see anyone here going low but you.
*I don't know how the ULA works? That's weird, since I've been part of most of our projects.
*We ignore indy media and don't promote as much talent as we can? Really weird. We cover the whole gamut and want to bust the best of the underground beyond its current ghetto.
*What's all this about you being smart? What could you mean? Have you ever done or said anything that mattered? Talk about 4th-grade. Whew.
*Yet you declare our strategic protest to be childish and supposedly aimed at profs. Whew again.
Now that we have that all straight...
T, why don't you come up with something of substance: What you think should be done. Writers you like. Hopefuls you've discovered. Links to your own work. Or go home. It's only basic netiquette, kid.
Like Frank: he says what he knows, relates what he did and what he learned from it. Yeah!
We have to be careful to avoid vampires and energy-suckers. King mentions this risk. Netiquette puts it more simply: ignore the trolls.
Our position is clear in our projects, websites, posts. New people aren't dummies---they quickly find our info and see what we're up to. Our momentum keeps growing as people catch on.
We have to remember that these are fake allegations. We answered them with our first action. I sometimes think that responding to a troll is a chance to explain our project in case new people are looking in. That can be OK, if done briefly. I get carried away. It's no real opportunity. Mop up, move on.
If someone who's sincere has a question, great. We see plenty of real challenges, suggestions, obstacles and opportunities.
Like Frank---he wants to see more---great!
But ignore the trolls.
The upcoming ULA public reading and challenge on the steps in front of a phony event is a perfect media op. It sends a message to the general public about what we stand for. It's a message anyone can relate to. It opens up the impact and appeal of literature.
It's the public liberation of a captive undergrounder: cool.
We're not a fringe group protesting the mainstream. We're regular people exposing and thus liberating the greatest artform from the grip of elites and giving it back to the public.
The win is a no-brainer. As King says: Who wants to be part of history? Just show up! It's fun stuff. Sure, we swing and miss here, but our average is good. We've had some amazing hits. Anyone in our cause who swings a few times is going to connect. I tell ya, it was rich indeed defending the cause from the anonymous, paranoid lies on Amazon that one time: and having the nutty liar exposed as Dave Eggers. The more we do the more the public will get the sense that there's more to literature than the chic, neurotic ghetto being presented.
It's up for grabs as to who best exploits our openings. We'll try to keep our own momentum building. But even the Fancy Lads could wake up and start looking beyond their walls for bigger, bolder talent.
As of last June, the real Frank Wilford's email address was Kentuck444@aol.com. That comes from an online message board, and you can google it up yourself. It's not something that was just cooked up.
Why doesn't the ULA leadership write him and verify that he wrote the above postings. If not, someone has committed identity theft.
This is my last posting here, and I apologize for remaining anonymous. But "someone" is setting you up, and you ought to check it out. Farewell and best of luck, Charles.
hi
can anyone help me
i have tried for over a week now to get a loan,i have very bad credit history mainly due to a failed marrage ,i have had all the usual ,wh loans,advantage loans ,yes loans ,get in touch and promise a [url=http://www.usainstantpayday.com]bad credit loans[/url] on paying the brokerage fee,i am reluctant due to reviews on the net and i have been stung before by a company called wentorth finance ,and never got the loan of the 50 pound fee back,
i have had an offer from flm but need a gaurantor which isnt really an option either .
i wondered if anyone had any loan companys that considered bad credit ,but loaned direct without these numerous sites with different alias but mainly did same thing pay us and we will get u loan (maybe)senario
has anyone also heard of a company called fresh loans they have they sent me details out but the may be a charge but not always ,i suspect she didnt want to tell me there was a charge
thanks
ReegeWeamma
loved las vegas? impel an deed the all reborn [url=http://www.casinolasvegass.com]casino[/url] las vegas at www.casinolasvegass.com with all to the area and beyond 75 ritzy manumitted [url=http://www.casinolasvegass.com]online casino[/url] games like slots, roulette, baccarat, craps and more and relinquish a light-hearted result in existent currency with our $400 cost-free bonus.
we ruddy unvaried safer games then the over the hill online [url=http://www.place-a-bet.net/]casino[/url] www.place-a-bet.net!
hellopeople this is a great forum hope im welcome :)
Buy online generic drugs from [url=http://allergyrxstore.com/] Drugstore[/url] , no prior prescription and free consultation. On our drug from [url=http://allergyrxstore.com/] Drugstore[/url] you can [url=http://allergyrxstore.com/] buy online generic[/url] Periactin (Cyproheptadine) .
Buy online generic drug from [url=http://allergyrxstore.com/]online medstore[/url] , no prior prescription and free consultation. On our drugs from [url=http://allergyrxstore.com/]online medstore[/url] you can [url=http://allergyrxstore.com/]order online medicines[/url] Zyrtec (Cetirizine).
offshore pharmacy somaviagra side effects trusted pharmacy catalog
[url=http://www.bebo.com/buylevitraonline1]buy dream levitra online pharmaceutical[/url]
Hello everybody! I don't know where to start but hope this place will be useful for me.
Hope to receive any help from you if I will have some quesitons.
Thanks in advance and good luck! :)
I just signed up here.
Do you enjoy watching movies online?
View popular TV shows such as Gossip Girl, Weeds, Lost and much more!
[url=http://www.channelblender.com/watch-movies/movies]Free Internet TV[/url]
[url=http://bejepewa.t35.com/news_690.html]online gambling and legality[/url] [url=http://bejepewa.t35.com/news_43.html]gambling tips online[/url] [url=http://bejepewa.t35.com/news_419.html]free online casino bonus[/url] [url=http://bejepewa.t35.com/news_458.html]indian gaming casinos in california[/url] [url=http://bejepewa.t35.com/news_81.html]free play promotion casino account[/url]
[url=http://bewutore.t35.com/news_193.html]online casino play real money[/url] [url=http://bewutore.t35.com/news_90.html]new casino no deposit bonus[/url] [url=http://bewutore.t35.com/news_441.html]best casino online web[/url] [url=http://bewutore.t35.com/news_359.html]online casinos offering free spins[/url] [url=http://bewutore.t35.com/news_528.html]online xasino poker onlinecasino casinocity[/url]
[url=http://bidejehi.t35.com/news_480.html]gambling online legal[/url] [url=http://bidejehi.t35.com/news_312.html]las vegas hotels q online gambling[/url] [url=http://bidejehi.t35.com/news_329.html]bonus casino free sign up[/url] [url=http://bidejehi.t35.com/news_642.html]casino gambling online strategy[/url] [url=http://bidejehi.t35.com/news_409.html]online gambling free starting money[/url]
[u]Секс Урюпинск знакомства реальный сайт секс знакомств юлдаш сайт знакомств [/u]
знакомства секс фото анкеты знакомства для секса Фатеж знакомства по городу белгород
[u]Интим знакомства Саяногорск Секс Ханты-Мансийский автономный округ Югра знакомства [/u]
http://facatuci.t35.com http://facatuci.t35.com/cat14.html http://facatuci.t35.com/cat12.html
http://energetyka-polska.eu/produkcja-bimbru
http://pl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Specjalna:Nowe_strony
http://energetyka-polska.eu/produkcja-papieru
http://energetyka-polska.eu/przemysl-lekki
http://energetyka-polska.eu/
http://energetyka-polska.eu/produkcja-bimbru
http://energetyka-polska.eu/produkcja-bimbru
http://energetyka-polska.eu/farby
http://energetyka-polska.eu/farby
http://pl.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Terytorium_Orleanu&redirect=no
http://energetyka-polska.eu/przemysl-metalurgiczny
http://energetyka-polska.eu/przemysl-drzewny
http://energetyka-polska.eu/przemysl-spozywczy
http://energetyka-polska.eu/elektrownia
http://energetyka-polska.eu/rodzaje-paliw
http://energetyka-polska.eu/przemysl-w-polsce
http://energetyka-polska.eu/paliwa-alternatywne
http://energetyka-polska.eu/biomasa-w-polsce
Post a Comment