Life Mimicks Art

Word has it that rain is dampening the Occupy Wall Street activities in New York City. Curiously enough, there's a rainstorm during the key protest in my new e-novel, THE TOWER. Buy it now at Nook Books or Kindle Store and see.

Before May Day

Tomorrow promises to be a day of much activity. Many Occupy protests are planned across the country. Those looking for insights should read a new novel which is in effect an anatomy of a protest-- THE TOWER, authored by myself, King Wenclas, now available at Kindle Store and Nook Books.  I have enough of a background at activism and engagement to know what I'm talking about.

The Meaning of Occupy Wall Street

The Occupy protests will have meaning if the ideals found and announced at them are continued. The tasks are
A.) decentralizing power;
B.) fighting corruption;
C.) democratizing the society and culture.

Curious Appearance

Note the New York Observer article by Emerald Pellot, here:
http://www.observer.com/2011/11/the-write-side-of-history-lethem-and-other-lit-types-speak-at-occupy/

Did their agents send them out there? Their publicists? Do Jennifer Egan and Jonathan Lethem-- both who I've been covering here-- have books to promote? We know that Jennifer Egan has been on a reading tour, at the same time she was made the publicity photo poster child for "Occupy Writers." Cynical, cynical. From Pellot's article, it doesn't sound like Egan has much experience at activism.

As for Jonathan Lethem, his appearance is more like the arrival of a postmodern literary god, "At the appointed time," Emerald Pellot tells us, accompanied by a "small entourage of camera people."

 "This is a lucky day for me to stand before you," the aristocrat tells the peasants, er, Occupiers.

Lethem assumes "no particular privileges." Unmentioned is that he's been accepting "particular privileges" of a lavish variety for many years.

Pellot informs us that Lethem "condemned the cynical press and unruly corporate regimes." But, Jonathan, you're a creation and creature of that very same cynical press (his appearance being quite cynical), and those same corporate regimes.

I ask: Will these two much lauded and applauded privileged literary persons now change their ways and embrace democracy in literature? Will they herein show that they're not there for cynical reasons of publicity, that their appearance isn't merely for show? Will they now reach out to those writers who've been fighting against corruption, cronyism, and monopoly for many years?

We'll see, I guess, won't we?